Trust promoting Jain Community entitled to registration if it was also working for benefit of general public

Facts:

a) The assessee-trust applied for registration in terms of section 12A.

b) The Commissioner refused such registration on the ground that the objects and activities of the trust were not charitable and were mainly for the purposes of a Jain Community and, therefore, provisions of section 13(1)(b) were attracted.

c) On appeal, the Tribunal was of the view that the Commissioner could not mix the requirements of registration of a trust with that of granting exemption under section 13.

The High Court held as under:

1) It was seen that, the Commissioner focused his attention on particular clauses of the objects of the trust to come to the conclusion that the same were for the benefit of a certain religious communities only, in the process ignoring various other objects, for e.g., the trust would engage itself in activities relating to education by maintaining and running education centers, run hostels, training centers for creating awareness in the common people and to make the education available to the public.

2) It would also engage in imparting training in computers. The trust would engage in doing all activities for medical help and to establish and administer dispensaries, hospitals and laboratories etc. It would also help the patients by supplying medicines and financial assistance. Likewise the trust could engage in rural development schemes.

CIT can’t consider violation of provisions of sec. 13 while granting registration to a trust

Provisions of section 13 couldn't be applied to deny registration to a trust or an Institution under section 12A - It shall be applied to decide deduction to be allowable to a trust or an Institution while completing assessment proceedings.

Facts:

a) In the instant case, one of the objects of the trust was limited to the benefit of Jain community;

b) The CIT contended that trust had violated provisions of section 13(1)(b) since benefits of sections 11 and 12 could not be extended to the charitable trust or institution which was established for the benefit of any specific religious community. Hence, he denied registration to trust under section 12A.

Issue:

• The issue that arose for consideration before the Tribunal was:

• "Whether the CIT has erred in denying the trust registration under Section 12A holding that the object clause of the Trust Deed is specifically for the benefit of the Jain Community which is a specific religious community and hence attracts the provisions of sec.13(1)(b)?"

The Tribunal Held in favour of assessee as under:

1)In order to avail of the deduction under sections 11 and 12 of the Act, the trust or institution has to make an application for registration under section 12AA of the Act;

2)The CIT after satisfying himself about the objects of the trust or Institution and about the genuineness of its activities, had to pass an order in writing granting or refusing the registration;

3)The Assessing Officer had to consider non-fulfillment of the conditions laid down in section 13(1)(b) during assessment procedure while allowing deduction under sections 11 and 12 to the trust or Institution;

4)Therefore, the CIT was not authorized to consider violation by the trust or Institution on account of provisions of section 13(1)(b) while granting it registration under section 12A-Kul Foundation v. CIT[2015] 54 taxmann.com 143 (Pune - Trib.)

Explicit religious trust won't get registration; Madarsa with dual purpose of charity and religious gets registration

The Supreme Court held as under:

1)  The objects of trust providing for activities of religious nature and were restricted to the specific communities were objects with religious purpose only. However, other objects would not be purely religious in nature if such objects trace their source to the Holy Quran and resolve to abide by the path of godliness shown by Allah;

2)  The establishment of Madarsas or institutions to impart religious education to the masses would qualify as a charitable purpose under the head of education under the provisions of section 2(15). The Madarsas do not confine themselves to only dissipation of religious teachings but also contribute to the holistic education of an individual;

3)  Therefore, the objects of the trust exhibited the dual tenor of religious and charitable purposes and activities;

4)  From the phraseology in section 13(1)(b), it could be inferred that the Legislature intended to include only the trusts established for charitable purposes in such provision. That, however, would not mean that if a trust was a composite one, i.e., one for both religious and charitable purposes, it would not be covered by clause (b);

5)  What was intended to be excluded from being eligible for exemption under section 11 was a trust for charitable purpose which was established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste;

6)  In the instant case, the objects of the trust were based on religious tenets under Quran according to religious faith of Islam. The perusal of the objects and purposes of the trust would clearly demonstrate that the activities of the trust, though, were both charitable and religious, yet were not exclusively meant for a particular religious community;

7)  The objects of trust did not channel the benefits to any community and, thus, would not fall under the provisions of section 13(1)(b).Thus, assessee was a charitable and religious trust which did not benefit any specific religious community and, therefore, it would be eligible to claim exemption under section 11.- CIT v. Dawoodi Bohara Jamat [2014] 43 taxmann.com 243 (SC)