Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Hike in Stamp Duty on Syndicate Loan Financing

1. Financing of infrastructure projects by means of syndicate loan arrangements is a common practice. Syndicate financing refers to a practice wherein a loan is sanctioned to a single borrower jointly by a group of lenders generally on the same terms. These lenders are usually banks, but they can also include other financial institutions. One amongst all these lenders is designated as the lead lender who provides probable participants with a memorandum including borrower specific information. The lead lender also acts as the security trustee on behalf of all other lenders, therefore, it holds the mortgaged property for and on behalf of all other lenders.
StampDuty is a type of government tax which is attracted on every instrument in form of a document by which any rights or liabilities are to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded. A mortgage deed for the purpose of the Stamp Act is an instrument, hence, applicable, stamp duty is applicable. Therefore, in the syndicate loan financing model the single mortgage deed executed between the borrower and the security trustee (lead lender) would be constituted as an instrument, hence, amenable to stamp duty. Whether such instrument would constitute to encompass only one transaction or whether such instrument shall encompass to include multiple transactions with all other lender banks was the question raised before the Supreme Court.
Facts of the Case
2. In the present case of Chief Controlling Revenue Authority v. Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd.[C.A. No. 6054 of 2015, dated 11-8-2015] the respondent Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd. ("CGPL") needed financial assistance for setting-up an ultra-mega power project in the area of Kutch-Bhuj. For that purpose it secured assistance from a few lenders. The lenders, i.e., financial institutions, which were thirteen in number, formed a consortium as a trust and executed a security trustee agreement ("STA") inter se appointing one banker, viz,. the SBI as the security trustee.
CGPL had executed an 'Indenture of Mortgage for Delayed After Assets Deed' ("Mortgage Deed") with the SBI, mortgaging its assets as mentioned in the deed itself. The said document was presented for registration by paying stamp duty of Rs. 4,21,000/- and the deed was registered. However, according to the Stamp Authority, CGPL was liable to pay Rs. 54,62,000/- as stamp duty on the said deed and, hence, demanded the balance amount of Rs. 50,41,000/- from CGPL.
2.1 Applicable Law - For the purpose of this case the following provisions of the Stamp Act are relevant:
2.1-1 Section 2(1) - Defines "instrument" to include every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded but does not include a bill of exchange, cheque, promissory note, bill of lading, letter of credit policy of insurance, transfer of share, debenture, proxy and receipt.

2.1-2 Section 5 deals with - Instrument relating to several distinct matters or distinct transactions: Any instrument comprising or relating to several distinct matters shall be chargeable with the aggregate amount of the duties with which separate instrument, each comprising or relating to one of such matters or distinct transactions, would be chargeable under this Act.
Click here to Know More at

ICSI allows 10 secretarial audits for practicing Company Secretaries for F.Y. 2016-17

The Council of Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) has reviewed the existing limit for issue of ‘Secretarial Audit Report’ by ‘Practicing Company Secretaries’ (PCS). The Council has also issued set of FAQs to clarify questions relating to the limits of Secretarial Audit. The key takeaways from revised limits are enumerated hereunder:

1.  10 Secretarial Audits allowed per PCS for F.Y. 2016-17 : The Council has fixed 10 Secretarial Audits per partner/Practicing Company Secretary (‘PCS’) for financial year 2016-17.        

Additional 5 Secretarial Audit Reports for peer reviewed unit : The council has allowed PCS to carry out an additional 5 Secretarial Audits in case he has been peer reviewed. With regard to queries as to whom the 5 additional secretarial audit reports would be allowed-whether to individual partners or the practice unit as whole? And whether there is any overall cap on limit on issuing of Secretarial Audit Report? The council clarified that the limit of 5 additional secretarial audits of Peer Reviewed Unit is to be considered as 5 secretarial audits for each individual partner, subject to overall limit of 15 secretarial audits per individual