Facts:
1.
Assessee was engaged in
manufacturing and exporting lead and its alloys. It exported goods on July 14,
2008 a er payment of duty and filed rebate claim under Rule 18 of the Central
Excise Rules, 2002 on September 10, 2009.
2.
The adjudicating authority
rejected the claim on the ground of limitation stating that the rebate claim
was filed a er expiry of one year from the date a er export of goods as per
Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee filed writ petition
contending that provisions of Section 11B would not be applicable to the
instant case.
3.
The assessee also argued that
the refund claim could not be filed until export documents and shipping bills
were received from Custom authorities. Since the relevant documents were
received in first week of September, 2009, refund claim could not be filed. The
assessee contended that even if Section 11B was considered to be applicable,
then the date of release of the necessary documents by the department would be
the date for computation of limitation.
The High Court of
Rajasthan held as under:
a. The High Court observed that
as per Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the refund claim was to be
filed by submitting application along with relevant documents before the expiry
of one year from the relevant date. If the Customs authorities delayed parting
with a copy of shipping bill bearing necessary endorsement, assessee could not
be put to disadvantage on the ground of limitation when the assessee was not in
a position to make a claim without accompanying documents.
b.
The High Court relied on the
decision of a divisional bench of the Gujrat High Court in case of Cosmonaut
Chemicals v. Union of India 2008 taxmann.com 1346 where it was held
that an assessee could not be penalized if refund claim had not been filed due
to non- availability of requisite documents and lapse was on account of the
Central Excise Department or Customs.
c.
Hence, the High Court directed
the revenue authorities to allow the refund/rebate to the petitioner together
with statutory rate of interest. - [2016] 69 taxmann.com 195 (Rajasthan)
No comments:
Post a Comment