Facts
a) Assessee earned capital gain on sale of his tenancy
rights in a residential house property. He invested the sale proceeds to
purchase another house property which was in a dilapidated condition.
b) In order to make the said house fit for residential
purpose, assessee incurred certain expenses on repairs and painting work etc.
Assessee claimed deduction under section 54 in respect of expenses so incurred
to make the new house property habitable.
c) Assessing Officer (AO) contended that only the cost
paid for acquiring new residential house is to be taken for the purposes of
granting benefit under section 54 and not cost incurred towards the improvement
of the same. Thus, the claim of the assessee towards cost of making a new house
property habitable was disallowed.
d) The CIT(A) confirmed the order of the AO. Aggrieved
by the order of the AO, assessee filed the instant appeal before the tribunal.
The tribunal held in favour of assessee as under-
1) Section 54 provides exemption with respect to long
term capital gains earned on transfer of residential house property, if the
taxpayer purchases or constructs a new residential house property within the
prescribed time-limit.
2) The word 'house' has been defined in Blacks Law
dictionary as 'a home, dwelling or residence'. Thus, the property should be
capable of being 'habitable'.
3) Section 54 does not stipulate any condition that if
the new residential house is purchased by the taxpayer, then benefit associated
with construction of the said new residential house cannot be extended
simultaneously rather both purchase and construction of the same new
residential house can co-exist.
4) In the instant case, it was undisputed that the
assessee had purchased the new residential house in dilapidated condition and
immediately thereafter he undertook extensive civil, plumbing, electrical &
painting works to make it habitable, which tantamount to construction within
the meaning of section 54.
5) Hence, exemption under section 54 couldn’t be
denied merely on the ground that the assessee had purchased the new residential
house and, therefore, benefit as available to construction of the new
residential house cannot be extended to the assessee simultaneously- [2016] 69
taxmann.com 42 (Mumbai - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment