Facts
a) Surveying
authority conducted survey at premises of assessee and alleged excess stock by
weighing stock on basis of cartons. Consequently, the Assessing Officer (AO)
made addition on account of excess stock.
b) Assessee
challenged that no addition could made on account of excess stock as weighment
was not done by the surveying authority in accordance with the provisions of
the Standards and Weights and Measures Act, 1976.
c) CIT(A)
upheld the addition made by the AO by observing that there was no evidence that
the assessee provided to the survey team the necessary facility of weighment by
a standardized scale.
d) Aggrieved
by the order of the CIT(A), assessee filed the instant appeal before the
tribunal.
The
tribunal held in favour of assessee as under-
1) The
mandate of the law is that assessee must be made aware, by the statutory
authority i.e. the income-tax authority, that the stock found in the survey is
to be weighted as per the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures
Act, 1976, for which purpose the necessary facility is to be provided by the assessee
to the authority. The authority cannot hold such legal requirement from the
assessee prejudicially and then, on the contrary, hold that assessee was liable
for not making good such legal requirement.
2) The
CIT(A) had illegally casted the burden on the assessee by observing that it was
the assessee who did not provide the requisite facility of weighment to the
surveying authority, whereas the position was quite dramatically opposite.
3) So,
it was the surveying authority who arbitrarily never required the assessee to
provide him with the weighment facility and it was not the assessee who refused
to do so. Therefore, the addition made in income of the assessee was liable to
be quashed- [2016] 68 taxmann.com 288 (Amritsar - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment