Facts
a)
Assessee
acquired business of a company including its trademark. It claimed depreciation
on cost incurred on acquisition of such trademark.
b)
Assessing
Officer (AO) disallowed depreciation on ground that trademark was not
registered in the name of assessee.
c)
CIT(A)
confirmed the order of AO. Aggrieved assessee filed the instant appeal before
tribunal.
The tribunal held in favour of assessee as
under-
1)
Section
32 of the Income-tax Act allows depreciation on trademark which is owned, wholly or partly, by the assessee and used for the purposes
of the business or profession. The
admissibility of depreciation on trademark is not contingent upon its
registration.
2)
In the instant case, the entire business was transferred to
the assessee as a going concern and the assessee was conducting the business as
such under the same trademark. Hence, the effective use of the trademark was
not disputed.
3)
Further, the rights to use the trademark were assigned to the
assessee by the person who had these legal rights. Therefore, the fact that the
trademark was not registered in the name of the assessee would not affect
assessee's valuable rights. Hence,
assessee was eligible for claiming depreciation on trademark- [2016] 67
taxmann.com 348 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment