Facts
a)
Assessee purchased a property for a consideration
of Rs. 48 lakhs. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the stamp duty value
of such property was much higher than the consideration declared by the
assessee.
b)
AO treated stamp duty value as fair market
value of such property as per section 50C and, accordingly, made addition under
section 69B by treating the differential amount as unexplained investment.
c)
CIT(A) set aside the order of AO by holding
that section 50C applies only to seller of property and not to buyer of
property.
d)
Aggrieved by the order of CIT(A), assessee
filed the instant appeal before the tribunal.
The
tribunal held in favour of assessee as under-
1)
Substitution of 'full value of
consideration received' with 'the stamp value' in terms of section 50C, is
applicable in the hands of the seller of the property who has to compute
capital gains under section 48 pursuant to transfer of a capital asset in the
nature of land or building or both.
2)
Hence, section 50C is a deeming provision
which is applicable only for computation of capital gain in the case of seller
of any land or building or both. The same cannot be extended to the case of the
purchaser to estimate the undisclosed investment.
3)
Further, in order to invoke the provisions
of section 69B, the burden is on the revenue to prove that the assessee has
invested in property over and above what is disclosed in its balance sheet.
There was nothing on record to show that the assessee had made any additional
investment in addition to what had been stated in the books of account.
4)
Therefore, no addition could be made in the
hands of the purchaser on the basis of stamp duty value- [2016] 67 taxmann.com
166 (Kolkata - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment