Facts
a)
The case of the assessee was
selected for scrutiny and, accordingly, notice under section 143(2) was issued
upon him. The notice was generated through the software application of the
Income-tax Department and was sent to the assessee at the address given in the
return of income.
b)
Assessee filed an affidavit
stating that said notice was not served. However, in affidavit, assessee had
not furnished any reasons or evidences as to why notice sent at correct address
could not be served on assessee.
c)
It was noticed that address of
assessee in affidavit was different from address provided in return of income,
which showed that assessee had changed his address and new address was not
communicated to Income-tax Department.
Issue
Whether notice served on old
address could be quashed where assessee didn’t communicate the correct address
or change in address to the Income-tax department?
The tribunal held in favour of revenue as under-
1)
One of the important facts which was noticed in the instant case
was that the new address of the assessee in the affidavit was different from
the address provided in the return of income, which went to show that the
assessee had changed his address and the new address was not communicated to
the Income-tax Department.
2)
The onus to
communicate the correct address or change of address to the Department either
applying through prescribed form for making correction in permanent account
number (PAN) database or communication to the Assessing Officer was on the
assessee, which the assessee failed to do.
3)
Therefore,
notice served on old address could not be quashed as assessee himself had not
reported the new address to the income-tax department- [2016] 67 taxmann.com
109 (Delhi - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment