Where
Government employees were asked by Government to undertake air travel under LTC
from OP airlines, Government being consumer enjoyed liberty to exercise its
choice of airlines and no case of contravention of sections 3 and 4 was made
out against Government and OP airlines
Facts:
a) The
informant, a Government employee, filed information against Air India, its
subsidiaries and the Government of India alleging contravention of section 4 of
Competition Act, 2012
b) It
was alleged that Government forced through its policy/directives orders
employees to avail air travel services offered only by Air India for Leave
Travel Concession (LTC) Scheme at a price which was much higher than those
offered by its competitors in market.
c) The
informant also stated that, despite being conscious of the said
anti-competitive practices of Air India and Other Airlines such as Jet Airways,
Spice jet Airlines, Indigo Airlines, Go Air Airlines and Vistara Airlines had
remained silent which might be attributed to a cartel amongst them or because
of the fear of a regulatory backlash from Government of India
d) The
informant prayed before the Commission to inter
alia impose penalties on Air India for engaging in abuse of dominant
position, direct Government to discontinue its present practices of favouring
Air India
The
Competition Commission of India held as under:
1)
The
Government was consumer of air travel services as tickets purchased under LTC
scheme were funded by it and being a consumer, the Government enjoyed liberty
to exercise its choice even if such exercise of choice caused a favourable
treatment for Air India or other player operating in market. Thus, no case could
be made out against Government under any of provisions of Act
2)
Once Government
had exercised its free choice to avail services of Air India, allegation of
abuse for charging excessive (unfair) price against Air India also did not
hold. Thus, no case of contravention of provisions of either section 3 or 4 of
the Competition Act, 2002 could be made out against Opposite Parties – [2016]
66 taxmann.com 22 (CCI)
No comments:
Post a Comment