Central Excise: Where, as per
exemption notification, DTA clearances by EOU are liable to excise duty equal
to duty on clearances by non-EOUs, said DTA clearances are to be valued as per
Central Excise Valuation rules.
Facts:
a)
Assessee was a 100% EOU engaged
in manufacture of instant tea. It cleared tea manufactured wholly out of
indigenous raw materials, to its sister concerns in EOU.
b)
Since, as per Notifications
8/97 and 23/2003, said clearance of tea was liable duty equal to ‘excise duty’
and any excess was exempted, assessee valued said tea as per rule 8 of Central
Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000.
c)
Department argued that since
DTA clearances by EOU are liable to excise duty equal to ‘customs duty
leviable’, tea was to be valued as per customs law.
d)
Tribunal decided in favour of
assessee and aggrieved department filed civil appeal in Apex Court.
Apex Court decided in
favour of Assessee as under:
1) There is no doubt that the
duty of excise leviable under Section 3 would be on the basis of the value of
like goods produced or manufactured outside India as determinable in accordance
with the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
However, the notification states that duty calculated on the said basis would
only be payable to the extent of like goods manufactured in India by persons
other than 100% EOUs.
2)
It is clear that in the absence
of actual sales in the wholesale market, when goods are captively consumed and
not sold, Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules would have to be followed to
determine what would be the amount equal to the duty of excise leviable on like
goods.
3)
It is also clear that the said
notification has been framed by the Central Government, in its wisdom, to levy
only what is levied by way of excise duty on similar goods manufactured in
India, on goods produced and sold by 100% EOUs in the domestic tariff area if
they are produced from indigenous raw materials.
4)
Therefore, DTA clearances by
assessee are rightly valued as per Central Excise Valuation rules. Appeal is,
accordingly, dismissed - Commissioner of Central Excise v. Nestle India Ltd.
[2015] 63 taxmann.com 312 (SC)
No comments:
Post a Comment