Facts:
a) The Land Acquisition Officer (‘LAO’) acquired assessee’s lands and paid compensation
to assessee in installments from financial year 2000-01 to 2005-06. He had deducted tax at source on the entire
compensation and remitted the same to the department.
b) However, TDS certificate was issued in favour
of petitioner only in financial year 2005-06. The petitioner filed application
for refund of the tax so deducted.
c) The Commissioner rejected the said application
on ground that the petitioner had not prayed for refund within a period of six
years i.e. 2000-01 to 2005-06. The aggrieved-assessee filed the instant
petition.
The
High Court held in favour of assessee as under:
1) The TDS certificate was issued in favour of the
petitioner only on 10-2-2005. Only thereafter, petitioner came to know that
certain sum was deducted at source from the compensation;
2) The petitioner filed the returns in the year
2005 itself. Thus, there was no delay on the part of the petitioner. No tax
deduction was required be made under section 194-L(2) from any payment made on
or after June 1, 2000;
3) Thus, deduction made by the LAO towards tax,
out of the compensation awarded was illegal. Therefore, the amount so deducted was
to be refunded to the petitioner. - Ashok B. Jadhav v. CIT [2014] 44 taxmann.com 102 (Karnataka)
No comments:
Post a Comment