No technical skill was
required to render services for transmission of bulk SMS data, thus, payments for
said services could not be regarded as 'fee for technical services'.
Facts:
a) The assessee had made carrier payments to
Clickatel (‘NR Company’) for transmission of bulk SMS data without withholding any
taxes.
b) The Assessing Officer disallowed such payments
by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(i). On appeal, the CIT(A) deleted such disallowance. The aggrieved-revenue filed
the instant appeal.
The
Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:
1) The nature of services rendered by NR Company
was only for transmission of bulk SMS data. No technical skill was required for
transmission of such data;
2) The CIT(A) had rightly held that carrier was a medium
for sending bulk SMS and, thus, it could not be considered as technical
services.
3) Since the payments made by assessee to NR Company were not 'fee for
technical services,' they were not liable for taxation in India;
4) Thus, assessee was not required to deduct tax at source while making such
payments. The CIT(A) was justified in deleting impugned disallowance.- Dy.
CIT v. Velti India (P.) Ltd [2014] 43 taxmann.com 425 (Chennai - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment