Where
assessee-institute was approved as Government autonomous body for educational
purpose but was not wholly or substantially financed by Government, exemption under
section 10(23C) (iiiab) could not be allowed.
Facts:
a) The assessee, an educational institution, claimed its income as exempt
under section 10(23C)(iiiab) by contending that institute was approved by the Punjab Government and it was
100% funded Govt. Autonomous Body.
b) The Assessing Officer disallowed
exemption claimed by assessee on ground that assessee-society had been granted
exemption under section 10(23C)(vi).
The Tribunal held in favour of revenue
as under:
1) The assessee-institute was an educational
institute but his main motto was profit. It was also approved as the 100 per
cent Govt. autonomous body;
2) The Government had not financed any paisa to
the institute in the last 5 years because the institute was already having a
good amount lying in Fixed Deposits with Banks;
3) The assessee was not fulfilling the conditions
regarding the institutions ought to have been wholly or substantially financed
by the Government. The assessee had not produced any documentary evidence to
prove that the assessee had got approval from the prescribed authority for the
exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab);
4) Therefore, the assessee was not entitled to exemption
under section 10(23C)(vi).- Dy. CIT v. Malout Institute of Management &
Information Technology [2014] 43 taxmann.com 228 (Amritsar - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment