Order passed by Commissioner under
section 119(2)(b) was an administrative order against which appeal before
Tribunal under section 253 was not maintainable.
Facts:
a) The assessees approached the Commissioner for
regularization of their returns in terms of section 119(2)(b);
b) The CIT rejected said applications. However, the Tribunal directed the
Commissioner to consider the case of the assessees afresh, after giving proper
opportunity of being heard to them.
c) Aggrieved-CIT
filed the instant appeal.
The High Court held as under:
1) In
view of section 253, appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner under
section 119(2)(b) was not maintainable;
2) Such
order passed by the Commissioner under section 119(2)(b) was an administrative
order against which appeal before Tribunal under section 253 would not be
maintainable;
3) Thus,
the Tribunal had materially erred in entertaining the appeals against the order
passed by the Commissioner under section 119(2)(b) and had materially erred in
passing the impugned order directing the Commissioner to consider the case of
the respondent-assessees afresh. – CIT v.
Rasida Ibrahimbhai Vohra [2014] 42
taxmann.com 85 (Gujarat)
No comments:
Post a Comment