Merely because loan used
by assessee in improvement of house was a general loan and not a housing loan,
cost of improvement could not be disallowed.
Facts:
a) The assessee had borrowed loan from a bank for improving the house
property. He had sold said property and while computing capital gains, he had
claimed cost of improvement.
b) The Assessing Officer had disallowed the claim of assessee merely because the loan was classified as a
general loan and not as a housing loan.
The Tribunal held as
under:
1) The assessee had claimed deduction of cost of
improvement of property while computing capital gains during the assessment year
2006-07;
2) The original construction of property was made
in the year 1991-92, thus, there would have been some kind of improvement or maintenance
after lapse of so many years. Therefore, the assessee’s claim could not be rejected
in toto;
3) The assessee would have spent considerable
amount during the assessment year 2006-07 at least for maintenance of the
building, if not on improvement of the original construction.
4) Thus, cost of improvement could not be
disallowed merely because it was sourced through general loan and not through
housing loan. Therefore,
rejecting the claim of the assessee in toto was not justified. - K.K. Venugopalv. Dy. CIT [2014] 42
taxmann.com 389 (Cochin - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment