Where main object of assessee-trust was to protect investors by way of creating a fund, which was a public charitable fund set up to advance an object of general public utility, assessee became entitled to get registration under section 12AA
Facts:
a) The assessee-trust was formed by coming together of 23 regional Stock Exchanges of India to provide a common platform for trading in shares and securities;
b) Its main object was to protect investors by way of creating a fund, which could provide compensation to them in case of loss on account of default by any member of a participating recognized Stock Exchange;
c) The assessee made an application under section 12A for grant of registration which was rejected by competent authority. Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal.
The Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:
1) An object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of general public utility. To serve a charitable purpose, it is not necessary that the object leads to the benefit of the whole mankind or all persons in a particular Country or even State;
2) It would be sufficient if the intention is to benefit a section of the community, sufficiently defined and identifiable by some common quality of a public or impersonal nature;
3) What is to be seen is the intention to benefit a section of the public as distinguished from a specified individual or group;
4) Once it was decided that the assessee’s principal object was the advancement of an object of any general public utility, it would not be material if the income by way of contributions from the member stock exchanges was otherwise exempt under section 10(23EA) or not;
5) Thus, the fund created by assessee was a public charitable fund having been set up to advance an object of general public utility, assessee was entitled to get registration - Inter-connected Stock Exchange Investors Protection Fund ( ISE IPF) v. Director of Income-tax (Exemption) [2013] 38 taxmann.com 329 (Mumbai - Trib.)
Facts:
a) The assessee-trust was formed by coming together of 23 regional Stock Exchanges of India to provide a common platform for trading in shares and securities;
b) Its main object was to protect investors by way of creating a fund, which could provide compensation to them in case of loss on account of default by any member of a participating recognized Stock Exchange;
c) The assessee made an application under section 12A for grant of registration which was rejected by competent authority. Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal.
The Tribunal held in favour of assessee as under:
1) An object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of general public utility. To serve a charitable purpose, it is not necessary that the object leads to the benefit of the whole mankind or all persons in a particular Country or even State;
2) It would be sufficient if the intention is to benefit a section of the community, sufficiently defined and identifiable by some common quality of a public or impersonal nature;
3) What is to be seen is the intention to benefit a section of the public as distinguished from a specified individual or group;
4) Once it was decided that the assessee’s principal object was the advancement of an object of any general public utility, it would not be material if the income by way of contributions from the member stock exchanges was otherwise exempt under section 10(23EA) or not;
5) Thus, the fund created by assessee was a public charitable fund having been set up to advance an object of general public utility, assessee was entitled to get registration - Inter-connected Stock Exchange Investors Protection Fund ( ISE IPF) v. Director of Income-tax (Exemption) [2013] 38 taxmann.com 329 (Mumbai - Trib.)
No comments:
Post a Comment